<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Net Neautrality</title>
		<link>http://apocalypseco.darkbb.com/net-neautrality-f13/-t1.htm</link>
		<description>Post your amazing pieces of art here</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:58:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>saving the net</title>
			<link>http://apocalypseco.darkbb.com/net-neautrality-f13/saving-the-net-t52.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>cha0ssword[PM]</dc:creator>
			<description>Virgin has been trying to calm the internet revolt against them for saying they would limit users' internet access for commercial ends, stating &quot;We're not suggesting there will be any denial of access to those who don't want to pay.&quot; and then going on to confirm their previous anti-net neutrality statement: &quot;VM could offer content providers deals to upgrade their provisioning if they want to ensure best access to to broadband subscribers.&quot;. They did not comment on their earlier  ...</description>
			<category>Net Neautrality</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:58:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://apocalypseco.darkbb.com/net-neautrality-f13/saving-the-net-t52.htm#1111</comments>
			<guid>http://apocalypseco.darkbb.com/net-neautrality-f13/saving-the-net-t52.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>